Right now, its just a placeholder – for a post about something that has happened…
something that I saw happen…
something that I have images of…
something that is, well…
Marriage Derangement Syndrome…
Does it cause schizophrenia?
Or just conflicts of interest?
Yes Monty, it would be door number three! Now, granted, one can be forgiven for mistaking door number three for door number two:
Of course, you could also be forgiven for getting confused as to whether you’re watching ABC or CBS. You see, I have been using Let’s Make a Dealallusions, but one to The Price is Right is appropos as well – given that if your guess as to the price of your Showcase is close enough to its actual retail price, then you get both Showcases.
When your conflict of interest appears to be creating a fake online identity to mask your involvement (under what one would presume is your real name) with (and what would presume is a vested interest in promoting) same-sex-marriage-primacy when you participate, in a quasi-official capacity, in threads in which you pimp the discredited notion that pushing same-sex-marriage helps trans people as individual trans personsAND using that quasi-official capacity to boot a dissenter who did notactually publish personal information about you but merely publicly inquired as to whether an unidentified someone with certain qualifications ‘A’ might have a conflict of interest by acting in certain capacity ‘B’…
then one can understand why doors two and three might be applicable.
Having said that, I might suggest not asking to see what Jay Stewart has in his box when next he walks down the aisle. My buddy Kathleen mysteriously disappeared.
Words that she had already utttered were un-uttered – but not by her.
Yes, her voice just drifted off into the night…
I’ve still had not even a notice that my account was deleted or a response to my emails asking for info.
…and who knows where her cyber remains might turn up. Perhaps right here at ENDABlog!
She wants to be out about being [Capacity 'B'] & about being the Communications Director working mostly on marriage online have others no be permitted speak of this public info. While at the same time have the ability to link the two publicly for her benefit – but punish others for even questioning whether disclosure is warranted.
That Marriage Derangement Syndrome thing is pretty nasty.
Well, I know what people with Marriage Derangement Syndrome don’t give a rat’s ass about: compromise on anything other than trans rights.
And at least one of them doesn’t really seem to get if you out yourself, then when someone else copies or points to what you outed yourself with, then that second personn really isn’t outing you about what you were initially ‘in’ about…
…and, instead, what you’re being outed about is having a major conflict of interest.
And I’m outing her here as having committed an egregious act of transphobic cyber-bullying by (apparently) unilaterally booting Kathleen off of a major LGBT blog after having outed herself via her own references to Equal Rights Washington – which are only one google-laden mouse click away from http://neworganizing.com given that a nice chunk of the bio there is identical to the one at ERW – and her involvement in it and having done so in a forum that anyone could read and multiple-google-click away from. Has she now committed this cyber hate crime against Kathleen because she realized she actually outed herself and erasing Kathleen’s existence at that blog is the only way that she can come close to un-outing herself?
Do a text search on the page from which I took the ERW image snap. The name of the blog in question appears in only one of the bios. If “Lurleen” didn’t out herself in that reply to Kathleen, then she apparently outed some other “front page blogger” at that blog – in which case, it is Lurleen and not Kathleen whose existence should be erased from that blog.
But, that’s not the case.
Look at the photos.
“Lurleen” outed herself – and she apparently not only wants to make Kathleen pay for it but feels that she is so much better than us scummy trans scum that she doesn’t even need to directly inform Kathleen of what she is asserting to be the reason that Kathleen’s existence was erased from that blog.
[S]he acted as the judge in her own complaint? Sweet deal! Very fair.
But, that’s par for the course.
Trans people have been paying the price for the indulgences of people afflicted with Marriage Derangement Syndrome for many years now.
Why should 2011 be any different?
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 1st, 2011 at 11:35 pm and is filed under Action Alerts, History. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackbackfrom your own site.